Getting Started with Neural Networks: 3 Foundations You Need to Understand

Advertisement

Nov 04, 2025 By Alison Perry

Neural networks seem to be everywhere now—from powering search engines and recommendation systems to helping cars understand roads. The technology sounds intriguing, often wrapped in technical terms and layers of abstraction. But before you open a dozen tabs on convolutional layers or activation functions, there are a few core ideas you should get a firm grip on.

These concepts don’t just help you understand how neural networks work; they help you avoid confusion, wasted time, and unrealistic expectations. Here’s what you need to know before going deeper.

Neural Networks Learn Differently Than Traditional Programs

At a glance, neural networks might look like just another kind of code, but they don’t operate the way traditional programming does. In regular programming, you write rules to solve a problem. With neural networks, you feed the system data, and it learns the rules based on patterns.

The heart of a neural network is its ability to approximate complex functions. It does this by adjusting the weights of connections between artificial neurons based on examples during training. This process, called gradient descent, moves the network gradually toward better accuracy by minimizing the difference between its output and the correct answer.

What this means in practical terms is that you’re not defining logic manually. Instead, you’re giving the network lots of labeled examples and letting it discover the relationships. But this has consequences:

  • It requires a significant amount of clean, labeled data.
  • It doesn’t “understand” things the way people do.
  • It’s prone to overfitting if the dataset isn’t representative or large enough.

So if you’re coming from a background in traditional coding, adjust your mindset. You’re not programming a machine to follow your logic—you’re training it to find its own.

Data Quality and Structure Matter More Than Model Size

There’s a common misunderstanding that bigger neural networks automatically mean better results. More layers, more neurons, more parameters—those must be better, right? Not quite.

The accuracy and performance of a neural network heavily depend on the quality of the data it's trained on. If your input data is messy, inconsistent, or biased, even the most advanced architecture will struggle. A clean, balanced dataset with relevant features often leads to better outcomes than a large model fed poor-quality inputs.

Let’s take an example: Suppose you're training a neural network to recognize handwritten numbers. If the training set includes thousands of clear examples from a few people but none from others with different writing styles, your model will perform poorly when exposed to real-world data. It's not the fault of the network architecture—it's the data.

Structure matters too. Neural networks work well when the input data is organized and preprocessed correctly. Normalizing input values, encoding categorical variables, and handling missing data appropriately all affect the model’s ability to learn. Neglecting this can cause training to stall or produce unreliable predictions.

Before you tweak hyperparameters or add layers, ask whether your data is helping or hurting the learning process. A modest model on good data often outperforms a deep one fed junk.

Interpretability Is Hard—and That's Okay at First

One of the ongoing criticisms of neural networks is that they behave like a “black box.” You feed in input and get an output, but it’s hard to understand why the model made a specific decision. This is especially true for deep networks with many hidden layers.

This lack of interpretability can be frustrating, especially if you're used to logic you can trace line by line. With neural networks, you're often relying on statistical patterns that aren’t human-readable. For example, a convolutional neural network (CNN) might identify features in an image that look like noise to you but are meaningful to the model.

There are tools that help explain what’s going on inside a network—like saliency maps or SHAP values—but these methods are still evolving and often require experience to use properly.

At the start, don’t let the black box nature of neural networks overwhelm you. What matters more is whether the model performs well and generalizes to new data. Later, as you grow more confident, you can explore model interpretability in depth. For now, focus on whether the network does what it’s supposed to do, and understand that interpretability will come with time and experience.

Other Key Concepts You’ll Encounter Soon

While the three areas above are foundational, once you step in deeper, several other terms and ideas will surface quickly. Understanding what they point to helps you follow more advanced material later.

Overfitting and Underfitting: Overfitting happens when the model learns the training data too well and performs poorly on new data. Underfitting means the model hasn’t learned enough from the data. Striking the right balance is key.

Activation Functions: These introduce non-linearity, allowing networks to learn more complex patterns. Common ones include ReLU, sigmoid, and tanh.

Loss Function: This tells the network how far off its predictions are from actual values. Common examples include mean squared error and cross-entropy.

Backpropagation: The core algorithm that updates the weights in the network using gradients.

Epochs and Batches: An epoch is one full pass through the training data, while batches are smaller subsets used to train the model iteratively.

These terms may feel technical now, but they’re all rooted in logical steps. Once you’ve understood how neural networks learn and why they require the setup they do, the rest begins to fall into place.

Conclusion

Before getting lost in layers and parameters, spend some time grasping the basics of how neural networks learn, how much they rely on data, and why they can be hard to interpret. These ideas form the foundation on which the rest of your learning will stand. Neural networks are not magic. They’re built on consistent rules and behaviors that become more understandable the more time you spend with them. Don’t worry if it feels abstract at first. Stick with it, keep your learning grounded in these fundamentals, and you’ll start connecting the dots faster than you think.

Advertisement

You May Like